Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Hepatology forum ; 2(3):91-96, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1918478

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: The impact of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment on disease severity and clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether HBV infection and the use of NUCs impacts mortality in patients with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: A total of 231 adult patients (77 with COVID-19 and HBV coinfection) with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Univariate and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors for mortality from COVID-19. Results: Patients with COVID-19 and HBV coinfection had a similar rate of mortality to those without HBV coinfection (7.8% vs 9.7%;p=0.627). Cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR]: 8.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-44.2;p=0.014) and a high basal aspartate transaminase level (OR: 7.94, 95% CI: 1.81-34.8;p=0.006) were independent predictors of mortality due to COVID-19. In the COVID-19 and HBV coinfection group, the patients who died had a significantly higher median level of HBV DNA than patients who survived (378 IU/mL vs 0 IU/mL;p=0.048). Thirty (39%) patients with HBV coinfection received NUC treatment, and none of these patients died. Conclusion: HBV infection was not associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19, and it seems that NUC treatment for HBV infection might have an antiviral effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

2.
Ren Fail ; 44(1): 233-240, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1692442

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Literature with regard to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated morbidities and the risk factors for death are still emerging. In this study, we investigated the presence of kidney damage markers and their predictive value for survival among hospitalized subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: Forty-seven participants was included and grouped as: 'COVID-19 patients before treatment', 'COVID-19 patients after treatment', 'COVID-19 patients under treatment in intensive care unit (ICU)', and 'controls'. Kidney function tests and several kidney injury biomarkers were compared between the groups. Cumulative rates of death from COVID-19 were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The associations between covariates including kidney injury markers and death from COVID-19 were examined, as well. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and cystatin C levels, urine Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1)/creatinine ratio, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), CKD-EPI cystatin C, and CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C levels demonstrated significant difference among the groups. The most significant difference was noted between the groups 'COVID-19 patients before treatment' and 'COVID-19 patients under treatment in ICU'. Advancing age, proteinuria, elevated serum cystatin C, and urine KIM-1/creatinine ratio were all significant univariate correlates of death (p < 0.05, for all). However, only elevated urine KIM-1/creatinine ratio retained significance in an age, sex, and comorbidities adjusted multivariable Cox regression (OR 6.11; 95% CI: 1.22-30.53; p = 0.02), whereas serum cystatin C showing only a statistically non-significant trend (OR 1.42; 95% CI: 0.00-2.52; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clearly demonstrated the acute kidney injury related to COVID-19. Moreover, urine KIM-1/creatinine ratio was associated with COVID-19 specific death.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Biomarkers/analysis , COVID-19/complications , Proteinuria/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Creatinine/urine , Cystatin C/blood , Female , Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Proteinuria/diagnosis , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Urinalysis
3.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 67(11): 1531-1537, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1573922

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe lung computed tomography findings of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, investigate whether the findings differ regarding age and gender, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest computed tomography based on the duration of symptoms at the time of presentation to the hospital. METHODS: From March 11 to May 11, 2020, 1271 consecutive patients (733 males and 538 females) were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Based on age, patients were divided into five separate subgroups. Then based on the duration of symptoms, patients were divided into five separate phases. The presence of lung lesion(s) and their characteristics, distribution patterns, and the presence of concomitant pleural thickening/effusion and other findings (malignancy, metastasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, bronchiectasis, cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion) were evaluated by five radiologists independently. RESULTS: The "normal lung computed tomography finding" was the most common chest CT finding (37%), followed by ground-glass opacity (31%). Regardless of the shape of the lesion, the distribution features were significant (peripheral, subpleural, and lower lobe distribution) (p<0.05). The presence of pleural thickening posteriorly and adjacent to the lesion was statistically different in groups 1-3 (p<0.05). Other concomitant pathologies, except pulmonary congestion, did not suppress the typical findings of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Chest computed tomography findings were mostly normal in the early phase (P1). Therefore, it may be appropriate to perform the first computed tomography screening of COVID-19 after 6 days to decrease the radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lung , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Turkey
4.
J Virol Methods ; 301: 114404, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1568893

ABSTRACT

The WHO-named Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection had become a pandemic within a short time period since it was detected in Wuhan. The outbreak required the screening of millions of samples daily and overwhelmed diagnostic laboratories worldwide. During this pandemic, the handling of patient specimens according to the universal guidelines was extremely difficult as the WHO, CDC and ECDC required cold chain compliance during transport and storage of the swab samples. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different storage conditions on the COVID-19 real-time PCR assay on 30 positive nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal samples stored at both ambient temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and +4 °C. The results revealed that all the samples stored at ambient temperature remain PCR positive for at least six days without any false-negative result. In conclusion, transporting and storing these types of swab samples at ambient temperature for six days under resource-limited conditions during the COVID-19 pandemics are acceptable.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Specimen Handling/methods , Temperature
5.
EBioMedicine ; 74: 103723, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1536518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused millions of deaths globally, yet the cellular mechanisms underlying the various effects of the disease remain poorly understood. Recently, a new analytical platform for comprehensive analysis of plasma protein profiles using proximity extension assays combined with next generation sequencing has been developed, which allows for multiple proteins to be analyzed simultaneously without sacrifice on accuracy or sensitivity. METHODS: We analyzed the plasma protein profiles of COVID-19 patients (n = 50) with mild and moderate symptoms by comparing the protein levels in newly diagnosed patients with the protein levels in the same individuals after 14 days. FINDINGS: The study has identified more than 200 proteins that are significantly elevated during infection and many of these are related to cytokine response and other immune-related functions. In addition, several other proteins are shown to be elevated, including SCARB2, a host cell receptor protein involved in virus entry. A comparison with the plasma protein response in patients with severe symptoms shows a highly similar pattern, but with some interesting differences. INTERPRETATION: The study presented here demonstrates the usefulness of "next generation plasma protein profiling" to identify molecular signatures of importance for disease progression and to allow monitoring of disease during recovery from the infection. The results will facilitate further studies to understand the molecular mechanism of the immune-related response of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. FUNDING: This work was financially supported by Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.


Subject(s)
Blood Proteins/classification , Blood Proteins/metabolism , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/pathology , Plasma/chemistry , Disease Progression , Gene Expression Profiling , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Humans , Proteome/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Adv Sci (Weinh) ; 8(17): e2101222, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1283720

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities, including the deficiencies in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+ ) and glutathione metabolism. Here it is investigated if administration of a mixture of combined metabolic activators (CMAs) consisting of glutathione and NAD+ precursors can restore metabolic function and thus aid the recovery of COVID-19 patients. CMAs include l-serine, N-acetyl-l-cysteine, nicotinamide riboside, and l-carnitine tartrate, salt form of l-carnitine. Placebo-controlled, open-label phase 2 study and double-blinded phase 3 clinical trials are conducted to investigate the time of symptom-free recovery on ambulatory patients using CMAs. The results of both studies show that the time to complete recovery is significantly shorter in the CMA group (6.6 vs 9.3 d) in phase 2 and (5.7 vs 9.2 d) in phase 3 trials compared to placebo group. A comprehensive analysis of the plasma metabolome and proteome reveals major metabolic changes. Plasma levels of proteins and metabolites associated with inflammation and antioxidant metabolism are significantly improved in patients treated with CMAs as compared to placebo. The results show that treating patients infected with COVID-19 with CMAs lead to a more rapid symptom-free recovery, suggesting a role for such a therapeutic regime in the treatment of infections leading to respiratory problems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Antioxidants/metabolism , COVID-19/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Inflammation/metabolism , Male , Metabolome/physiology , Middle Aged , Proteins/metabolism , Proteome/metabolism , Young Adult
7.
J Virol Methods ; 290: 114049, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1002851

ABSTRACT

The gold standard method in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the detection of viral RNA in the nasopharyngeal sample by RT-PCR. Recently, saliva samples have been suggested as an alternative sample. In the present study, we aimed to compare RT-PCR results in nasopharyngeal, oro-nasopharyngeal and saliva samples of COVID-19 patients. 98 of 200 patients were positive in RT-PCR analysis performed before the hospitalization. On day 0, at least one sample was positive in 67 % of 98 patients. The positivity rate was 83 % for both oro-nasopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples, while it was 63 % for saliva samples (p < 0.001). On day 5, RT-PCR was performed in 59 patients, 34 % had at least one positive result. The positivity rate was 55 % for both saliva and nasopharyngeal samples, while it was 60 % for oro-nasopharyngeal samples. Our study shows that the sampling saliva does not increase the sensitivity of RT-PCR tests at the early stages of infection. However, on the 5th day, viral RNA detection rates in saliva were similar to nasopharyngeal and oro-nasopharyngeal samples. In conclusion, we suggest that, in patients receiving treatment, RT-PCR in saliva, in addition to the standard samples, is important to determine the isolation period and control transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nasopharynx/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Saliva/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling , Time Factors
8.
Andrologia ; 53(2): e13912, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-947737

ABSTRACT

The study investigated whether there is a male reproductive system coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) phenomenon. Thirty participants who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study between April and May 2020. The participants were assigned in one of the three groups including COVID-19 patients before and after treatment, and controls. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within the semen samples was investigated. Additionally, participant's demographics, semen parameters and serum sex hormone levels were compared between the groups. SARS-CoV-2 was not detected within the semen samples. Sperm morphology and serum sex hormone levels were significantly different between the groups. In the post hoc analysis, sperm morphology was significantly lower in the COVID-19 patients. Patients before treatment had significantly lower serum FSH, LH and T levels than controls. However, patients after treatment had similar serum FSH, LH and T levels with controls and patients before treatment. In our opinion, COVID-19 and its treatment had no specific deteriorative effect on male sexual health at a short-time period. In the patients before treatment, decreased serum of T, FSH and LH levels was consistent with acute patient stress due to COVID-19. Similarly, it seems that decreased sperm morphology was associated with the acute fever.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/blood , Infertility, Male/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Semen/virology , Sexual Health , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood , Humans , Infertility, Male/virology , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Male , Pilot Projects , Semen Analysis , Testosterone/blood
10.
North Clin Istanb ; 7(3): 203-209, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-470654

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Turkey is one of the latest countries that COVID-19 disease was reported, with the first case on March 11, 2020, and since then, Istanbul became the epicenter of the pandemic in Turkey. Here, we reveal sequences of the virus isolated from three different patients with various clinical presentations. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swab specimens of the patients were tested positive for the COVID-19 by qRT-PCR. Viral RNA extraction was performed from the same swab samples. Amplicon based libraries were prepared and sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq platform. Raw sequencing data were processed for variant calling and generating near-complete genome sequences. All three genomes were evaluated and compared with other worldwide isolates. RESULTS: The patients showed various clinics (an asymptomatic patient, patient with mild disease, and with severe pulmonary infiltration). Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing approach successfully applied to generate near-complete genomes with an average depth of 2.616. All three viral genomes carried the D614G variant (G clade according to GISAID classification) with implications for the origin of a spread first through China to Europe then to Istanbul. CONCLUSION: Here, we report the viral genomes circulating in Istanbul for the first time. Further sequencing of the virus isolates may enable us to understand variations in disease presentation and association with viral factors if there is any. In addition, the sequencing of more viral genomes will delineate the spread of disease and will guide and ease the necessary measures taken to stem the spread of the novel coronavirus.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL